Israeli Legislation.com

Penal Law, 5737-1977

חוק העונשין, תשל"ז-1977

Published: 1977-08-04Consolidated Hebrew text as of 2026-07-02 · Last amended 2026-06-30✓ Amendment status checked against the Knesset legislation record on 2026-09-28
Premium
Unofficial English translation — for reference only. It may contain errors or omissions and cannot be relied on as a legal text. Only the Hebrew text published in Reshumot is legally binding.More

This English text was translated from the official Hebrew using a range of translation tools, and it undergoes ongoing checks and updates. It is not a certified translation.

Despite these checks, it may contain errors, omissions, or imprecise renderings of legal terminology and cross-references, and it may not yet reflect the latest amendments. It cannot be relied upon as a legal text.

The Hebrew text as published in Reshumot (ספר החוקים) and on the Knesset website is the sole authoritative and legally binding version. In any discrepancy, the Hebrew text prevails.

This translation is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For use in legal proceedings, request a certified Expert Legal Opinion.

Section D: Criminal Liability of a Corporation

Scope of Criminal Liability of a Corporation§
23.
(a)A corporation shall bear criminal liability —
(1)under section 22, where the offence was committed by a person in the course of the discharge of his functions in the corporation;
(2)for an offence requiring proof of criminal intent or negligence, if, in the circumstances of the matter and in light of the person's role, authority and responsibility in the management of the corporation's affairs, the act by which he committed the offence, and his criminal intent or negligence, are to be regarded as the act, and the intent or negligence, of the corporation.
(b)In an offence committed by omission, where the duty to act is imposed directly upon the corporation, it is immaterial whether the offence can also be attributed to a particular office holder in the corporation or not.

Need to cite this law in a foreign court?

Eli Shimony Israeli Attorneys-at-Law provides certified Expert Legal Opinions on Israeli law within 24–48 hours, accepted by courts worldwide.

Contact Us →

Section E: Offences According to Their Gravity

Classification of Offences§
24.

The following are the categories of offences according to their gravity:

(1)"felony" — an offence for which a punishment more severe than imprisonment for a period of three years is prescribed;
(2)"misdemeanour" — an offence for which imprisonment for a period exceeding three months and not exceeding three years is prescribed; and if the punishment is a fine only — a fine exceeding the amount of the fine that may be imposed for an offence whose punishment is a fine for which no sum has been prescribed;
(3)"contravention" — an offence for which imprisonment for a period not exceeding three months is prescribed, and if the punishment is a fine only — a fine not exceeding the amount of the fine that may be imposed for an offence whose punishment is a fine for which no sum has been prescribed.

Need to cite this law in a foreign court?

Eli Shimony Israeli Attorneys-at-Law provides certified Expert Legal Opinions on Israeli law within 24–48 hours, accepted by courts worldwide.

Contact Us →

Chapter V: Derivative Offences

Section A: Attempt

What Constitutes Attempt§
25.

A person attempts to commit an offence if, with intent to commit it, he performed an act that is more than mere preparation and the offence was not completed.

Impossibility of Committing the Offence§
26.

For the purposes of attempt, it is immaterial whether commission of the offence was impossible by reason of a state of affairs of which the person attempting was unaware or regarding which he was mistaken.

Special Punishment for Attempt§
27.

A provision prescribing a mandatory punishment or a minimum punishment for an offence shall not apply to an attempt to commit that offence.

Exemption on Account of Repentance§
28.

A person who attempted to commit an offence shall not bear criminal liability for the attempt if he proved that, of his own free will and out of repentance, he desisted from completing the act or made a substantial contribution to preventing the consequences upon which completion of the offence is contingent; however, nothing in the foregoing shall derogate from his criminal liability for another completed offence constituted by the act.

Need to cite this law in a foreign court?

Eli Shimony Israeli Attorneys-at-Law provides certified Expert Legal Opinions on Israeli law within 24–48 hours, accepted by courts worldwide.

Contact Us →

Section B: Parties to an Offence

Principal Offender§
29.
(a)A principal offender of an offence — including one who commits it jointly or through another.
(b)Persons who participate in the commission of an offence by performing acts for its commission are co-offenders, and it is immaterial whether all the acts were performed together or whether some were performed by one and some by another.
(c)A person who commits through another is a person who contributed to the performance of the act by another person who performed it as an instrument in his hands, where that other person was in a situation such as one of the following situations, within the meaning of this Law:
(1)minority or insanity;
(2)absence of control;
(3)without criminal intent;
(4)mistake as to a state of affairs;
(5)duress or justification.
(d)For the purposes of subsection (c), if the offence is conditional upon a special quality in the offender, a person shall be a principal offender of that offence even where the special quality exists in the other person alone.
Instigator§
30.

One who brings another to commit an offence by persuasion, encouragement, demand, entreaty, or any other means that constitutes the application of pressure, is an instigator to the commission of an offence.

Accomplice§
31.

A person who, before the commission of the offence or at the time of its commission, performed an act in order to enable the commission, to facilitate it or to secure it, or to prevent the apprehension of the principal offender, the detection of the offence or its spoils, or in order to contribute in another way to creating conditions for the commission of the offence, is an accomplice.

Punishment for Complicity§
32.

The punishment for complicity in committing an offence is half the punishment prescribed in a legislative provision for its principal commission; however, if prescribed for it is —

(1)a mandatory death sentence or mandatory life imprisonment — the punishment is twenty years' imprisonment;
(2)life imprisonment — the punishment is ten years' imprisonment;
(3)a minimum punishment — the punishment shall not be less than half the minimum punishment;
(4)any mandatory punishment — it shall be the maximum punishment, and half thereof shall be the minimum punishment.
Attempt to Instigate§
33.

The punishment for an attempt to instigate a person to commit an offence is half the punishment prescribed for its principal commission; however, if prescribed for it is —

(1)a mandatory death sentence or mandatory life imprisonment — the punishment is twenty years' imprisonment;
(2)life imprisonment — the punishment is ten years' imprisonment;
(3)a minimum punishment — the punishment shall not be less than half the minimum punishment;
(4)any mandatory punishment — it shall be the maximum punishment, and half thereof shall be the minimum punishment.
Exemption on Account of Repentance§
34.
(a)An instigator or accomplice shall not bear criminal liability for instigation or complicity, or for an attempt to instigate, if he prevented the commission of the offence or its completion, or if he notified the authorities in time of the offence for the purpose of preventing its commission or completion and did his best to that end by other means; however, nothing in the foregoing shall derogate from criminal liability for another completed offence constituted by the act.
(b)"Authorities", for the purposes of this section — the Israel Police, or another body authorised by law to prevent the commission of the offence or its completion.
A Different or Additional Offence§
34a.
(a)Where a principal offender commits, in the course of committing the offence, a different offence or one additional to it, in circumstances where a reasonable person could have been aware of the possibility of its commission —
(1)the remaining co-offenders shall also bear liability therefor; however, if the different or additional offence was committed with intent, the remaining principal offenders shall bear liability therefor only as for an offence of recklessness;
(2)the instigator or accomplice shall also bear liability therefor as for an offence of negligence, if such an offence exists on the same actus reus.
(b)Where a court has convicted an accused under subsection (a)(1) of an offence for which a mandatory punishment is prescribed, it may impose upon him a lighter punishment.
Objective and Personal Factors§
34b.

A factor that is a condition for the constitution of an offence shall have effect with respect to every party to that offence, even if it does not exist in him; however, a personal factor whose effect under a legislative provision is to aggravate, mitigate, otherwise alter, or preclude the punishment, shall have effect only with respect to that party in whom it exists.

Need to cite this law in a foreign court?

Eli Shimony Israeli Attorneys-at-Law provides certified Expert Legal Opinions on Israeli law within 24–48 hours, accepted by courts worldwide.

Contact Us →

Section C: Common Provisions

Bar to Attempt, Instigation and Complicity§
34c.

Attempt, instigation, attempt to instigate, or complicity in an offence that is a contravention are not punishable.

Application of the Law of the Offence§
34d.

Unless otherwise stated in or implied by a legislative provision, every law applicable to the principal commission of the completed offence applies also to an attempt, instigation, attempt to instigate, or complicity in that offence.

Need to cite this law in a foreign court?

Eli Shimony Israeli Attorneys-at-Law provides certified Expert Legal Opinions on Israeli law within 24–48 hours, accepted by courts worldwide.

Contact Us →

Chapter V-A: Defences to Criminal Liability

Section A: General Provisions

Burden of Proof§
34e.

Unless otherwise stated in a legislative provision, an act is presumed to have been done in conditions that do not constitute a defence to criminal liability.

Need to cite this law in a foreign court?

Eli Shimony Israeli Attorneys-at-Law provides certified Expert Legal Opinions on Israeli law within 24–48 hours, accepted by courts worldwide.

Contact Us →

Section B: Defences to the Criminality of the Act

Minority§
34f.

A person shall not bear criminal liability for an act done before he reached the age of twelve years.

Absence of Control§
34g.

A person shall not bear criminal liability for an act he committed if he was unable to choose between committing it and refraining from it owing to absence of control over his bodily movements in relation to that act, such as an act performed as a result of physical compulsion that the doer could not overcome, in the course of a reflex or convulsive reaction, during sleep, or in a state of automatism or hypnosis.

Insanity§
34h.

A person shall not bear criminal liability for an act he committed if, at the time of the act, by reason of a disease that afflicted his mind or by reason of a deficiency in his intellectual capacity, he substantially lacked the ability —

(1)to understand what he was doing or the wrongfulness of his act; or
(2)to refrain from committing the act.
Intoxication§
34i.
(a)A person shall not bear criminal liability for an act he committed in a state of intoxication that was caused otherwise than by his controlled behaviour or without his knowledge.
(b)Where a person committed an act in a state of intoxication and he caused that state by his controlled behaviour and knowingly, he shall be regarded as one who committed the act with criminal intent if the offence is one of conduct, or with indifference if the offence is also conditional upon a result.
(c)Where a person caused the state of intoxication in order to commit the offence thereby, he shall be regarded as one who committed it with criminal intent if it is an offence of conduct, or with purpose if it is also conditional upon a result.
(d)In this section, "state of intoxication" means a state in which a person is under the influence of an alcoholic substance, a dangerous drug or another intoxicating agent, and as a result thereof he substantially lacked the ability, at the time of the act, to understand what he was doing or the wrongfulness of his act, or to refrain from committing the act.
(e)Subsections (a), (b) and (c) apply also to a person who did not substantially lack ability as referred to in subsection (d), but who, owing to partial intoxication, was not aware, at the time of the act, of a particular element of the offence.
Self-Defence§
34j.

A person shall not bear criminal liability for an act that was immediately necessary in order to repel an unlawful attack from which there arose a tangible danger of harm to his life, liberty, body or property, or to those of another person; however, a person is not acting in self-defence where he brought about the attack by his own wrongful conduct while foreseeing in advance the possibility of the development of events.

Defence of a Dwelling, Business Premises and Enclosed Agricultural Holding§
34j1.
(a)A person shall not bear criminal liability for an act that was immediately necessary in order to repel a person who is breaking into or entering a dwelling, business premises or enclosed agricultural holding belonging to him or to another person, with intent to commit an offence, or a person who is attempting to break in or to enter as aforesaid.
(b)The provision of subsection (a) shall not apply if —
(1)the act was manifestly unreasonable in the circumstances of the case for the purpose of repelling the person breaking in or entering;
(2)the person brought about the break-in or entry by his wrongful conduct while foreseeing in advance the possibility of the development of events.
(c)For the purposes of this section, "agricultural holding" includes grazing land and land used for the storage of equipment and vehicles in an agricultural holding.
Necessity§
34k.

A person shall not bear criminal liability for an act that was immediately necessary in order to save his life, liberty, body or property, or those of another person, from a tangible danger of serious harm arising from a given state of affairs at the time of the act, and he had no other means but to do it.

Duress§
34l.

A person shall not bear criminal liability for an act he was ordered to do under a threat from which there arose a tangible danger of serious harm to his life, liberty, body or property, or to those of another person, and which he was compelled to do as a result.

Justification§
34m.

A person shall not bear criminal liability for an act he committed in any of the following circumstances:

(1)he was obligated or authorised by law to do it;
(2)he did it pursuant to an order of a competent authority that he was obligated by law to obey, unless the order is manifestly unlawful;
(3)in an act that requires consent by law, where the act was immediately necessary in order to save a person's life, the integrity of his body, or to prevent serious harm to his health, and in the circumstances of the case it was not possible for him to obtain the consent;
(4)he did it to a person with lawful consent, in the course of medical activity or treatment, the purpose of which was the benefit of that person or the benefit of another;
(5)he did it in the course of a sporting activity or sporting game that are not prohibited by law and do not contravene public policy, and in accordance with the rules customary therein.
Entry into a Situation by Wrongful Conduct§
34n.
(a)The provisions of sections 34g, 34k and 34l shall not apply if the doer was aware, or if a reasonable person in his position could, in the circumstances of the case, have been aware, before the creation of the situation in which he committed his act, that he was liable to commit it in that situation, and if he placed himself by controlled and wrongful conduct in that situation; provided that the subject-matter of the act committed in the situations referred to in section 34k or section 34l was not the saving of another person's interest.
(b)In a case as referred to in subsection (a), the person shall be regarded as one who committed the act with criminal intent if the offence is one of conduct, or with indifference if the offence is also conditional upon a result; where a person entered the situation in order to commit the offence, and it is also conditional upon a result, he shall be regarded as one who committed the offence with purpose.
Duty to Face Danger or Threat§
34o.

The provisions of sections 34k and 34l shall not apply where the person was under a duty by law or by virtue of his position to face the danger or the threat.

Exceeding What Is Reasonable§
34p.

The provisions of sections 34j, 34k and 34l shall not apply where the act was not reasonable in the circumstances of the case for the purpose of preventing the harm.

De Minimis§
34q.

A person shall not bear criminal liability for an act if, in view of the nature of the act, its circumstances, its results and the public interest, the act is of negligible gravity.

Mistake as to State of Affairs§
34r.
(a)A person who commits an act while imagining a state of affairs that does not exist shall not bear criminal liability except to the extent that he would have borne it had the situation actually been as he imagined it.
(b)Subsection (a) shall apply also to a negligence offence, provided that the mistake was reasonable, and to a strict liability offence subject to the provisions of section 22(b).
Mistake as to Legal State of Affairs§
34s.

For the purposes of criminal liability, it is immaterial whether the person imagined that his act was not prohibited, owing to a mistake as to the existence of a criminal prohibition or as to his understanding of the prohibition, unless the mistake was not reasonably avoidable.

Protection of Judicial Authority§
34t.

A judicial office holder shall not bear criminal liability for an act he committed in the performance of his judicial functions, even if he thereby exceeded the bounds of his jurisdiction.

Need to cite this law in a foreign court?

Eli Shimony Israeli Attorneys-at-Law provides certified Expert Legal Opinions on Israeli law within 24–48 hours, accepted by courts worldwide.

Contact Us →

Page 2 of 19

Read the entire law on one page — continuous text, no page breaks, plus PDF downloads.