Israeli Legislation.com

Evidence Ordinance [New Version], 5731-1971

פקודת הראיות [נוסח חדש], תשל"א-1971

Published: 1971-04-28Consolidated Hebrew text as of 2025-09-29 · Last amended 2022-07-10✓ Amendment status checked against the Knesset legislation record on 2026-09-04
Premium
Unofficial English translation — for reference only. It may contain errors or omissions and cannot be relied on as a legal text. Only the Hebrew text published in Reshumot is legally binding.More

This English text was translated from the official Hebrew using a range of translation tools, and it undergoes ongoing checks and updates. It is not a certified translation.

Despite these checks, it may contain errors, omissions, or imprecise renderings of legal terminology and cross-references, and it may not yet reflect the latest amendments. It cannot be relied upon as a legal text.

The Hebrew text as published in Reshumot (ספר החוקים) and on the Knesset website is the sole authoritative and legally binding version. In any discrepancy, the Hebrew text prevails.

This translation is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For use in legal proceedings, request a certified Expert Legal Opinion.

Chapter IV: Weight of Evidence

Weight of Testimony§

53.

The value of oral testimony and the credibility of witnesses are matters for the court to decide upon according to the conduct of the witnesses, the circumstances of the matter and the indications of truth that emerge during the trial.

Finding on the Basis of Uncorroborated Single Testimony in Civil Proceedings§

54.

Where a court in civil proceedings finds in one of the cases set out below on the basis of single testimony that is uncorroborated, and the testimony is not an admission by a party, it shall set out in its decision what moved it to be satisfied with that testimony; and these are the cases:

(1)the testimony is that of a minor under the age of 14;
(2)the testimony is that of a party or of the spouse, child, parent, brother or sister of a party;
(3)the testimony is that of a person who has an interest in the outcome of the proceedings in favour of the party who called him to testify;
(4)the action is against an estate, a minor, a person with a mental illness or an absentee;
(5)other circumstances in which, in the opinion of the court, such statement of reasons is required.

Finding on the Basis of Single Testimony in Criminal Proceedings§

54a.
(a)A court shall not convict an accused on the basis of the uncorroborated single testimony of his accomplice in the offence, unless it has found in the body of evidence something to corroborate it; however, if the accomplice was a state witness — his testimony requires corroboration; for this purpose, "state witness" — an accomplice in the same offence who testifies on behalf of the prosecution after a benefit has been given or promised to him.
(b)Where a court in proceedings concerning an offence under Section E of Chapter X of the Penal Law, 5737-1977 has convicted on the basis of the single testimony of the victim, it shall set out in the verdict what moved it to be satisfied with that testimony.
(c)Nothing in the provisions of this section shall derogate from the provisions of section 11 of the Evidence Revision (Protection of Children) Law, 5715-1955.

Testimony of a Minor Who Is Not Criminally Responsible§

55.
(a)A court hearing the testimony of a minor who is not criminally responsible by reason of his age shall first caution him in language comprehensible to the minor that he must testify to the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
(b)No person shall be convicted on the basis of the single testimony of a minor who is not criminally responsible by reason of his age, unless there is something in the body of evidence to corroborate it.

Evidence Received Unlawfully§

56.

Evidence that is inadmissible in criminal proceedings and was received in error or inadvertently shall not serve as proof of guilt and no judgment may be based upon it; nevertheless, the fact that the court heard the evidence shall not invalidate the judgment, unless the court is of the opinion that the accused would not have been convicted but for the production of that evidence, or that there is no other sufficient evidence apart from it to support the conviction.

Power to Exclude Evidence Obtained Unlawfully§

56a.
(a)A court trying a criminal case may decline to admit evidence that was obtained unlawfully, including a statement of an accused or a witness, an object or any other evidence, if it is satisfied that admitting it in the proceedings would substantially infringe the right to a fair hearing, having regard to the nature and gravity of the infringement, the degree of influence of the infringement on the evidence obtained and the public interest in admitting or not admitting the evidence; in this subsection, "infringement" — the obtaining of evidence unlawfully.
(b)Nothing in the provisions of subsection (a) shall derogate from the rules for excluding evidence set out in the provisions of other enactments.

Contradictory Evidence§

57.

Contradictions in the testimony of witnesses do not, in themselves, prevent the court from making findings of fact in respect of matters to which the contradictions related.

Presumption of Manufacturer§

57a.
(a)Where the name of a manufacturer, grower or packer (hereinafter — manufacturer), his business name or trade mark, or another name or mark capable of identifying him, is found on goods or on their packaging or on anything attached or appended to them, that shall constitute prima facie evidence that he manufactured, grew or packed the goods.
(b)Where the name of a distributor, his business name or trade mark, or another name or mark capable of identifying him, is found on goods or on their packaging or on anything attached or appended to them, and the name of a manufacturer is not found on them, the distributor shall be regarded for all purposes as if he were the manufacturer, unless he disclosed to the purchaser, or to a person duly authorised for that purpose, the identity of the manufacturer, when required to do so.

Presumption of Time of Manufacture§

57a1.

A food product on which the date of its manufacture is not indicated — it is presumed to have been manufactured within the year preceding the discovery of the offence committed in connection with it.

Need to cite this law in a foreign court?

Eli Shimony Israeli Attorneys-at-Law provides certified Expert Legal Opinions on Israeli law within 24–48 hours, accepted by courts worldwide.

Contact Us →

Chapter V: Miscellaneous

The Law Is a Matter of Common Knowledge§

57b.

Every law is a matter of common knowledge that requires no proof, unless a different intention is implied.

Service by Post§

57c.

Where an enactment permits or requires that a document be served by post, whether it uses the term "service" or the term "giving" or "sending" or another term, service shall be deemed — unless a different intention is implied — to have been effected —

(1)if a letter containing the document was posted and the address on the letter was correct and the postage was prepaid, or the letter was exempt from payment of postage or bore a mark indicating that it was sent in the service of the State;
(2)at the time at which the letter would have reached its destination in the ordinary course of post, unless the contrary is proved.

Fees§

58.

The Minister of Justice may prescribe, by Regulations, the rate of remuneration to be collected by an advocate for services rendered under section 15 and the fees payable for certification under section 15 otherwise than by an advocate.

Regulations§

59.
(a)The Minister of Justice may make Regulations for the purposes of this Ordinance.
(b)Regulations for the purposes of section 19 shall be binding as far as practicable in the circumstances; the Regulations contained in the Second Schedule shall remain in force insofar as they have not been amended, or until they are revoked, by Regulations made by the Minister under this section.

Application§

60.

The provisions of this Ordinance shall apply in proceedings before any court within the meaning of the Courts Law, 5717-1957, unless there is another provision to that effect.

Need to cite this law in a foreign court?

Eli Shimony Israeli Attorneys-at-Law provides certified Expert Legal Opinions on Israeli law within 24–48 hours, accepted by courts worldwide.

Contact Us →

First Schedule (Section 24)

Form of expert opinion

Form of medical certificate

Form of public officer's certificate

Need to cite this law in a foreign court?

Eli Shimony Israeli Attorneys-at-Law provides certified Expert Legal Opinions on Israeli law within 24–48 hours, accepted by courts worldwide.

Contact Us →

Second Schedule (Section 59(b))

Definitions§

1.

In these Regulations –

"administering officer" means a Registrar or a Magistrate's Court judge who administers an oath to a person or receives an affidavit from that person;

"affidavit" includes a certificate or document to which an affidavit is appended.

Name and address of deponent§

2.

An affidavit shall set out the deponent's full name, occupation or profession and address.

Form of affidavit§

3.

An affidavit may be drawn up in the first person or in the third person, and may for convenience be divided into paragraphs marked with consecutive numbers.

Alterations require authentication§

4.

Every interlineation, alteration, erasure or obliteration made in an affidavit before it is sworn shall be authenticated by the administering officer by signing his name, or his initials, in the margin beside it.

Illegible affidavit§

5.

If the affidavit is illegible or difficult to read, or if in the opinion of the person required to administer the oath it is written in a manner that facilitates fraudulent alteration, that person may refuse to administer the oath and may request that the affidavit be rewritten.

Signature of deponent§

6.

The deponent shall sign the affidavit at the time of swearing, and if unable to write, shall impress his mark thereon in the presence of the administering officer.

Jurat§

7.

Immediately following the end of an affidavit and at the foot of the page there shall appear the jurat, written without interlineations, alterations, erasures or obliterations and signed by the administering officer; the jurat shall set out —

(1)the names of the deponent and the administering officer;
(2)the date and place of swearing;
(3)that the oath on the affidavit was taken before the administering officer;
(4)if the deponent is blind or illiterate — that such is the case and that the affidavit was read aloud to the deponent in the presence of the administering officer and that the deponent appeared to understand its contents, and if the deponent impressed his mark in lieu of a signature — that he did so in the presence of the administering officer;
(5)such other necessary particulars as may be required.

Joint affidavit§

8.

Where several deponents join in swearing to a single affidavit, the names of all of them shall be written in the jurat and it shall be stated that each of them swore to the truth of the matters stated by that person in the affidavit.

Amendment of affidavit§

9.

The administering officer shall not permit any amendment to an affidavit without a further oath being taken thereon, and if the jurat has already been appended to the affidavit, a new jurat specifying the amendment shall be added; the administering officer may also refuse to permit a new oath and instead require that the affidavit be rewritten.

Form of oath§

10.

A person making an affidavit by oath shall use words to the following effect:

"I swear by God that this is my name and this is my signature (or: my mark) (and the person swearing shall point to his signature or mark), and that the contents of this my affidavit (or of the other document, as the case may be) are true."

A person making an affidavit by solemn affirmation shall use words to the following effect:

"I solemnly affirm that this is my name and this is my signature (or: my mark) (and the person affirming shall point to his signature or mark), and that the contents of this my affidavit are true."

And if the affidavit is a declaration neither by oath nor by solemn affirmation, the following words shall be added:

"I make this declaration in the sincere belief that it is true."

Need to cite this law in a foreign court?

Eli Shimony Israeli Attorneys-at-Law provides certified Expert Legal Opinions on Israeli law within 24–48 hours, accepted by courts worldwide.

Contact Us →

Page 3 of 3

Read the entire law on one page — continuous text, no page breaks, plus PDF downloads.