Israeli LegislationEnglish Edition

Translation Notice — This is an English translation of a Hebrew law and may contain inaccuracies. In any dispute or legal matter, the original Hebrew text as published in Reshumot (ספר החוקים) is the sole authoritative and legally binding version.

Ordinance

Police Ordinance [New Version]

פקודת המשטרה [נוסח חדש]

Part: The Accused's Plea Concerning the Description of the Facts, Whether All or in Part, and the Tribunal Did Not Permit Pursuant to Section 43

preamble-5.

The court may permit the adduction of evidence in relation to facts that are in dispute.

[Upon the plea of the accused]

Decision of the Court

s1-45.

If the accused has pleaded not guilty, or is deemed under this Ordinance to have done so, the prosecution case shall be opened.

[Following the plea of not guilty by the accused]

Decision of the Court

s1-46.
(a)If the accused has pleaded not guilty but admitted to facts, as referred to in paragraph (3) of Section 41(b), or if the court has decided, pursuant to Section 44, to treat him as having done so, those facts shall be deemed proven with respect to that accused.
(b)Notwithstanding subsection (a), in respect of a fact admitted by the accused in his plea, the court may require the prosecutor to prove it, and if the court has so required, it shall not be deemed proven until the prosecutor has proved it.

[Following admission of facts]

Decision of the Court

s1-47.

Where there are several accused in a trial and some of them have pleaded guilty, the court may convict those whose plea has been accepted as referred to in Section 44 and impose sentence upon them immediately, or defer the conviction until the verdict has been given in respect of all the accused; however, if such an accused is called to testify at the trial, the court shall convict him and impose sentence upon him before he is called to testify.

[Plea of guilty by some of the accused]

408 Book of Laws 17 14 Adar 5731 11.03.1971

Severance of Trial

Procedure Following

s1-48.

Where there are several accused in a trial, the court may, at any stage of the proceedings prior to verdict, order a separate trial for one or more of them, and continue with the trial of the remaining accused.

[the severance]

Procedure in a Severed Trial

s1-49.

Where a court has ordered severance of a trial, the court constituted for the purpose of the separate trial may conduct it either on the basis of the original indictment or on the basis of a new indictment; if a new indictment has been filed, its date of filing shall be deemed to be the date on which the original indictment was filed with the court that decided to order a separate trial.

Opening of the Prosecution Case

s1-50.

Once the prosecution case has been opened pursuant to Section 45, the prosecutor may bring before the court the prosecution witnesses — whether or not their names were included in the indictment — and the remainder of the prosecution evidence, and may, before calling witnesses, deliver an opening address for the prosecution case; however, where the name of a prosecution witness was not included in the indictment, the court shall, upon the application of the accused, adjourn the continuation of the hearing for a reasonable time.

Submission of No Case to Answer

s1-51.
(a)At the conclusion of the prosecution case, the accused or his defence counsel may submit that the charge has not been proved even on a prima facie basis.
(b)If a submission has been made pursuant to subsection (a), the prosecutor may reply to it.
(c)If a submission has been made pursuant to subsection (a) and the court is of the opinion that the charge has not been proved even on a prima facie basis, it shall acquit the accused; and the court may do so even if the accused or his defence counsel has not so submitted.

[The defence]

Opening of the Defence Case

s1-52.

If the accused has not been acquitted pursuant to Section 51, the President of the court shall explain to him that he is entitled, during the defence case, to do one of the following:

(1)to remain silent;
(2)to make a statement from his place, and if he does so, he shall not be cross-examined on what he says;
(3)to testify from the witness stand, and if he does so, his status shall be that of a defence witness.

The Defence Case

s1-53.

Following the address by the President of the court as referred to in Section 52, the accused or his defence counsel may bring before the court defence witnesses and other defence evidence; and may, before calling witnesses, deliver an opening address for the defence case.

[The court]

Evidence on Behalf of

s1-54.
(a)The court may summon any witness as a court witness, even if his testimony has already been heard by the court, if the court considers it necessary for the clarification of the case.
(b)If the court has done so after the conclusion of the defence case, the defence may adduce evidence to rebut evidence received against the accused pursuant to subsection (a).

[on behalf of the prosecution]

Additional Evidence

s1-55.
(a)The court may permit the prosecution, whether after the conclusion of the defence case or after witnesses have been heard pursuant to Section 54(b), to adduce evidence to rebut points that arose in that evidence and which the prosecution could not have anticipated in advance.
(b)If the prosecution has been permitted to adduce evidence after evidence on behalf of the court has been received, its evidence shall be heard first and thereafter the defence evidence, if the defence so wishes.

409 Book of Laws 17 14 Adar 5731 11.03.1971

s1-56.

If the prosecution has adduced evidence pursuant to Section 55(a), the defence may adduce evidence to rebut the prosecution evidence so adduced, even if it has exercised its right under Section 54(b).

[The defence following additional evidence on behalf of the prosecution]

Evidence on Behalf of

s1-57.

The court may exercise its power under Section 54 repeatedly at any time prior to verdict.

[to hear evidence on its own behalf]

Testimony on Oath

s1-58.
(a)Every witness shall testify on oath, unless the court is satisfied that the witness's religious belief prohibits him from taking an oath, or that the witness has no religious belief whatsoever, in which cases he shall testify by affirmation.
(b)A minor whom the court considers does not understand the nature of an oath may, if the court is satisfied that it is necessary to hear his testimony, have his testimony taken without an oath.
(c)A witness who comes to testify shall swear or affirm to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

Order of Taking Testimony

s1-59.

The order for the taking of testimony shall be as follows:

(1)The witness shall first be examined by the party who requested the hearing of the witness; thereafter the opposing party may, subject to Section 61, cross-examine the witness, and thereafter the party who requested the hearing of the witness may re-examine him; once the parties have concluded their examinations, the court may examine the witness, provided that for the purpose of clarification it may put questions to him also before the conclusion of their examinations; if the court has examined a witness after the parties have examined him, it may permit the parties to examine him further on their behalf for the purpose of clarifying any matter that arose in the court's examination;
(2)A witness summoned pursuant to a decision of the court, as referred to in Section 54(a), shall first be examined by the court, after which the parties may cross-examine him in the order determined by the court.

Examination of Witnesses

s1-60.

In the examination of a witness, the court shall not permit any examination which in its opinion is irrelevant to the matter under consideration and is not fair; and in particular, the court shall not permit any examination that involves insult, intimidation, deception, or humiliation that are not relevant to the matter under consideration and are not fair.

Witnesses in a Trial with Several Accused

s1-61.

Where there are several accused in a single trial, the order of examining witnesses shall be —

(1)in cross-examination — the accused or their defence counsel in the order in which the accused are listed in the indictment;
(2)in examination-in-chief — first the accused, or his defence counsel, who requested the hearing of that witness, and thereafter the remaining accused or their defence counsel in the order referred to in paragraph (1).

[Several accused]

Witnesses in a Trial — Particular Cases

s1-62.

If the court is of the opinion that the testimony of one of the accused is likely to be given against another accused, it may deviate from the order prescribed in Section 61 and permit that other accused or his defence counsel to examine him not by way of examination-in-chief but by way of cross-examination, after the other accused have examined him in examination-in-chief and before the prosecutor does so.

[In particular cases]

Right of Cross-Examination

s1-63.

The court may permit the parties to adduce also such evidence as is required for the purpose of deliberating on a plea of objection to a judge or on a preliminary plea, and may likewise permit them to adduce evidence concerning anything said by the accused outside the court that has been submitted as evidence.

[The deliberation on the merits of the matter]

Adducing Evidence Before

s1-64.

The court may refuse a request to summon a witness if it is of the opinion that the witness's testimony is not relevant to the matter under deliberation, or that the content of the testimony can be proved by other means.

[Summoning of witnesses]

410 Book of Laws 17 14 Adar 5731 11.03.1971

Amendment of the Charge

Authority to Refuse

s1-65.

The court may, at any stage of the proceedings up to the verdict, amend the charge sheet by correcting or replacing it, as it sees fit.

[Trial on the new charge]

Date of Arraignment

s1-66.

Where a charge sheet has been amended or replaced, the accused shall be deemed to have been arraigned on that charge sheet on the date on which he was arraigned under the original charge sheet.

[Amendment of the charge sheet]

Amendment of Charge Without

s1-67.

The court may, without amending the charge sheet, convict an accused of an attempt to commit the offence with which he was charged, or of being an accessory after the fact, or of another offence arising from the same act, even if the accused was not so charged in the charge sheet, provided that the charge of which he was so convicted was proved by the evidence adduced before it in the course of the proceedings.

Summations

s1-68.

Upon conclusion of the case for the defence, the prosecutor, and thereafter the accused or his counsel, may present their summations.

Verdict

s1-69.

After the summations, or if there were no summations — after the conclusion of the case for the defence, the court shall decide, by a reasoned written decision in accordance with Section 78, whether the accused is to be convicted or acquitted.

Quashing of the Trial

s1-70.
(a)If a charge sheet is withdrawn before the accused is called to answer the charge, the court shall quash the trial; if the charge sheet is withdrawn after the accused has been called to answer the charge, the court shall not quash the trial unless it has decided to acquit the accused.
(b)If the accused is in detention, he shall be released from detention unless he is detained in respect of an offence that is not the subject of the charge sheet.

[The court]

Deliberation

s1-71.

The deliberation of the court shall be confidential and only the judges who sat in the proceedings shall participate therein.

Order of Deliberation

s1-72.

In deliberation, the president of the court shall ask the opinions of the judges in order of their rank, beginning with the lowest rank; the president of the court shall express his opinion last.

Participation in Voting

s1-73.

Every judge shall vote on every question arising in the course of the court's deliberation that requires a decision.

Decisions of the Court

s1-74.

A court shall decide by majority opinion; if there was no majority opinion as to the type or measure of punishment, a judge who proposed the most severe type or measure of punishment shall be deemed to have concurred in the opinion of the judge who proposed the opinion closest to his own.

Reasoning of Decision

s1-75.

The reasons for the decision of the court, and likewise the minority opinion if there was one, shall be set out in the decision, except for any detail that could prejudice the security of the State.

Minority Opinion

s1-76.

A decision of the court, including the judgment therein, shall be signed by all the judges; if the said decision contains a minority opinion, it shall be noted therein that it was given by majority opinion without disclosing the name of the holder of that minority opinion.

[Minority opinion to the parties]

Communication of Minority Opinion

s1-77.

The minority opinion is part of the record and the court shall bring it to the knowledge of the parties and shall read it together with the judgment; however, the court shall not disclose the name of the holder of that opinion.

[The judgment]

Reasons for the Verdict

s1-78.

The reasons for the verdict shall set out the facts proved to the court and the considerations that led it to reach its decision; if the accused was convicted, the verdict shall also cite the provision of the enactment under which he was convicted, whether expressly or by reference to the charge sheet.

[The judgment]

Reading of the Verdict

s1-79.

The verdict shall be read in public and shall be marked with the date of the reading.

Acquittal Judgment

s1-80.

If the accused is acquitted, that determination shall constitute the judgment, and if the accused was in detention in respect of the charge on which he was tried he shall be released immediately, unless he was also detained in respect of another offence of which he was not acquitted.

411 Book of Laws 17 14 Adar 5731 11.03.1971

s1-81.

If the court has convicted the accused, the prosecutor shall bring to the knowledge of the court the accused's conduct sheet, if one exists, and the list of his prior convictions, and he may adduce evidence capable of influencing the determination of the measure of punishment; thereafter the accused may make a statement or give testimony and may also adduce evidence of facts and circumstances capable of mitigating the punishment.

[Measure of punishment]

Evidence for the Determination of

s1-82.

Upon conclusion of the proceedings referred to in Section 81, the prosecutor, and thereafter the accused or his counsel, may present their summations regarding the measure of punishment; if counsel has summed up, the court shall allow the accused to have his last word.

[Measure of punishment]

Summaries Regarding

s1-83.

The sentence of a convicted defendant shall be determined in the judgment, which shall be attached to the verdict, and both together shall constitute the Judgment; the sentence shall be read publicly and shall be marked with the date of its reading.

Judgment

s1-84.

Where the trial was held in camera, the tribunal may determine that the reasons for the verdict or the sentence, in whole or in part, shall not be read publicly; however, in such case the Plaintiff and the defendant and his counsel shall be entitled to inspect them.

[Reasons]

Non-Reading of

s1-85.

Where the sentence required confirmation or the defendant was entitled to appeal against it, the tribunal shall notify the defendant and his counsel accordingly.

[Confirmation of Sentence and Right of Appeal]

Notice of the Need

s1-86.
(a)If one of the judges of the tribunal dies after the tribunal has been constituted, or is prevented from serving as a judge for any other reason, the person who constituted the tribunal shall include another judge in his place, and the tribunal in its new composition may continue the proceedings from the point reached in its previous composition, provided the defendant has not objected thereto.
(b)Where the person who constituted the tribunal has included another judge, Section 61 of the Ordinance shall apply also with respect to that judge.

Replacement of a Judge

s1-87.

In any matter of procedure for which no provision is made in this Schedule or in the Ordinance or in the Regulations made thereunder, the tribunal shall act in the manner that appears to it to be best for the doing of justice, provided that it gives reasons for its decision in this regard.

[Unforeseen]

Unforeseen Matters

s1-88.

The rules of evidence applicable in criminal matters in the courts of the State shall be binding upon the tribunal, except where this Schedule otherwise provides.

[General]

Rules of Evidence

s1-89.

The tribunal shall not admit a confession of a defendant as evidence unless it is satisfied that it was given by the defendant of his own free will.

[As Evidence]

Confession of a Defendant

s1-90.

A statement of one defendant lawfully given before a person authorized to take testimony under the Criminal Procedure Ordinance (Evidence) 5, is not admissible as evidence against other defendants.

[Against Other Defendants]

Statement of One Defendant

s1-91.

A printed form of police orders and any printed form of any other publication issued by the Inspector General or on behalf of the Israel Police and certified by the Inspector General as an official publication for the purposes of this Section, containing an order, Order, instruction or appointment, shall serve as prima facie evidence of the issuance of the order, Order, instruction or appointment and of their contents.

[For Official Police Publications]

Printed Forms

s1-92.

A document purporting to be signed by a police officer in the performance of his duty, and containing particulars regarding the matters listed below, shall serve as prima facie evidence thereof; and these are the matters:

(1)Service in the Israel Police or absence from such service;
(2)The unit to which a person belongs in the Israel Police;

5 Laws of Palestine, Vol. I, Chapter 34, p. 439.

[Police Documents as Evidence]

412 Book of Laws 17 14 Adar 5731 11.03.1971

(3)Offences of which a person has been convicted while serving in the Israel Police;
(4)The date of admission to or discharge from the Israel Police;
(5)Rank or position in the Israel Police, or the date of their receipt;
(6)Other personal particulars concerning a person's membership in the Israel Police;
(7)The presence of a vessel outside the coastal waters of the State of Israel;
(8)The monetary value of police property.

[As Evidence of Arrest]

Police Officer's Certificate

s1-93.

A document purporting to be signed by a police officer, attesting that a person was arrested or imprisoned on a certain day and at a certain place, shall serve as prima facie evidence thereof; however, the tribunal shall not admit such a document as evidence if the defendant has demanded that the signatory testify before the tribunal and the tribunal is of the opinion that for the purpose of doing justice it is desirable that the signatory so testify.

[Other Police Documents]

Documents

s1-94.
(a)A document purporting to be a standing order or a routine order of a police unit, or a register, log or other record maintained pursuant to law, pursuant to an authorized police order or pursuant to procedure, may be admitted by the tribunal as prima facie evidence of its contents.
(b)'Register', 'log' or 'other record', for the purposes of this Section — whether prepared in handwriting or by way of printing, duplication, photography, punched card, magnetic tape or by means of any other mechanical, electrical or electronic device.
(c)Where the tribunal has admitted as evidence another record as referred to in subsection (a), the defendant or the Plaintiff may demand that the person who made the record testify before the tribunal, and the tribunal shall accede to the demand if it is of the opinion that for the purpose of doing justice it is desirable that the recorder so testify.

Presumption of Publication

s1-95.

A printed form stating that it is one of the publications referred to in Section 91 and bearing a police emblem shall serve as prima facie evidence that it is such a publication.

Copies

s1-96.

A document made or certified by a police officer in the performance of his duty — a copy thereof, certified as a true copy under his signature or under the signature of the person responsible for the custody of the document, shall have the same legal force as the original document, and it shall be presumed to be a true copy; nothing in this Section shall deprive the defendant or his counsel of the right to inspect the original document pursuant to any law.

[The Tribunal]

Minutes of the Tribunal

s1-97.

Minutes of a tribunal signed by the President of the tribunal shall serve as conclusive evidence of the matters recorded therein, unless it is proved that the minutes were forged.

[To the Tribunal]

Submission of Documents to the Tribunal

s1-98.

A party to proceedings before a tribunal who wishes to rely in the proceedings on a document admissible as evidence pursuant to the provisions of any law shall submit it to the tribunal.

Contempt of the Tribunal

s1-99.
(a)A person who is not a police officer and who commits one of the following offences shall be liable to Imprisonment of three months:
(1)He was lawfully summoned to appear before a tribunal and did not appear, or appeared and left before receiving permission to do so, and did not show sufficient cause for his absence;
(2)He was lawfully required by the tribunal to take an oath or to affirm and did not do so;
(3)He was lawfully required by the tribunal to produce a document in his possession and without lawful justification did not produce it;
(4)Being a witness before the tribunal, he did not answer a question he was lawfully required to answer, or knowingly gave an evasive answer without lawful justification;
(5)He caused a disturbance or interruption in the course of the tribunal's proceedings.

413 Book of Laws 17 14 Adar 5731 11.03.1971

(b)A person who is not a police officer and who contempts the tribunal by using insulting or threatening language shall be liable to Imprisonment of six months.
(c)The authority to try offences under this Section is vested in the Magistrate's Court.
s1-100.

Where a defendant has been found guilty by a tribunal, the tribunal may Order that an instrument used by the offender in the commission of the offence be forfeited, even if the offender's ownership of the instrument has not been proved.

[Offence]

Forfeiture of Instruments of Offence

s1-101.

Where a defendant has been convicted by a tribunal of an offence relating to property not his own, and the property or

Need to cite this law in a foreign court?

Eli Shimony Israeli Attorneys-at-Law provides certified Expert Legal Opinions on Israeli law within 24–48 hours, accepted by courts worldwide.

Contact Us →

⚠ Disclaimer: This is an unofficial AI-assisted translation. The Hebrew version published in the official records (Reshumot) is the sole binding and legally valid text.